- Black-box versus white-box testing: white-box is more open, transparent, easier to test
- Blacklists versus white lists: blacklists are bad, mmmkay
- Black hats versus white hats: I'm apathetic to either but those evil blackhat scofflaws! ;-)
- ...
Yeah, it seems to me. This isn't a poke at Infosec by me since I haven't perceived overt racism by the people I follow or with whom I associate. And also to be fair, these words weren't introduced by Infosec. They were borrowed from some other context.
However, being ethnically a Euro-mutt, my perceptions are more than likely biased. Words do carry meaning, implied or not. I don't see this as a political-correctness issue. Rather, our words frame our mindset. Kinda like a same-origin policy breach. If I connote a feeling with a particular word, it will by nature, leak out into different realms of my being.
Now, having grown up and lived in Minnesota (you betcha!) most of my life, I do not connote the word white with 100% positive emotions; white snow definitely solicits negative feelings in me :-) But I do see the connotations and don't want to perpetuate them. Sadly, the alternatives aren't full of awesome-sauce:
- Black hat versus white hat: unauthorized hackers versus authorized hackers? (and hackers carries its own connotations... geez)
- Blacklists versus white-lists: exclusion-only filters versus inclusion-only filters? (7 syllables to replace 2 ain't cool)
- Black-box testing versus white-box testing: zero-knowledge testing versus full-knowledge testing? (not too bad)